The Factor Guru

Tips on accounts receivable financing and business practices.

Posts Tagged IFA

Scottsdale Bound a guest blog by Darla Auchinachie

Mar 11

Posted by Darla in General Information | No Comments

In six weeks, factoring executives will convene in sunny Arizona for the 2010 Factoring Conference.  I’m getting excited at the prospect of seeing all the folks I’ve met from past meetings.  From business acquaintances, to clients, referral sources, mentors, colleagues and even the dearest of friends – many of them will be in Arizona to interact and learn.  During each day there will be informational sessions and speakers who will provide insightful information and each evening provides opportunities for professionals to forge new relationships or solidify existing bonds.  I really don’t mean to make this sound like an advertisement as I write this I realize it may come across this way.  I guess that I am just a little fired up about seeing old friends and meeting new ones too.  You see I am proud to be a part of the factoring industry – I find that most of the people involved in this industry are exceptionally smart, somewhat boisterous and inherently generous.

I have received some phone calls this past month from newer entrants to the factoring industry asking me about this conference and if it is worthwhile to attend.  I respond, with full disclosure that I am actively involved with supporting the IFA and say wholeheartedly “OF COURSE!  This conference is a must for any professional associated with receivables finance in any way.”  I say if you can only afford (both in terms of time or money) to attend one conference each year then this is the one.  Yes, you can probably purchase an audio CD after the event – but that’s only half of the draw.

The people that you will meet at this conference you are likely to develop relationships with that will serve you well over the course of your career or through the growth of your company.  I’ve watched alliances form over the years… folks that met each other for the first time who nine, ten, and even 12 years ago are now engaged in participations together, have bought and sold portfolios amongst each other, and have hired one or another in various roles.  I’ve met owners of factoring companies who started with nothing and have grown their portfolio to wild heights.  I’ve met others who have built up a portfolio, sold it, and are now in their second round.  Sad to say, I have seen folks come and go too.  I’ve met new business development people who have moved up the ranks to sales managers, account executives who have moved up to operations managers, operations managers who have moved up to portfolio managers – and many of those will go on to start their own companies.  The amazing thing is that almost all of them will take a moment to provide advice and share war stories, or in general, they are just pretty fun to be around.

It is important to note that it is not just other factors who attend this meeting; Vendors, service providers, attorneys, complimentary businesses also are in attendance – these too can be healthy contacts for you. For example, I really enjoy the folks over at 20/20 Tax Resolution, Ansonia Credit, MotherFund and First Corporate Solutions just to name a few. They know their business and the factoring industry well. Think about it: Where else can you interact with the likes of Mike Ullman, John Beckstead and Steve Kurtz? Even the face reader guy, Mac Fulfer, is scary “spot on” with his observations, and Brian Van Nevel (who must have been a game show host in a past life) will channel his inner Alex Trebek for a very educational round of Factoring Jeopardy.  The creator of the Factor Guru blog, Genevieve Merritt, will be there as well as all the other contributing writers such as myself, Scot Pierce and Rich Eitleberg.

So if you haven’t already signed up… I’d be thinking of doing that soon.  The room block ends this weekend – I hope to see you in Scottsdale! It’s sure to be an educational and productive event.

Tags: , , , , , ,

A Call to Action: Regulatory Awareness

Jan 23

Posted by Gen Merritt in Economy | 1 Comment

no moneyWith the events surrounding CIT, many businesses and publications have noted an increased awareness on the importance of factoring. This was considered a good thing: educating the public on the value that factoring brings for small businesses across the U.S.  After all, CIT’s rise and later fall was not attributed to their factoring division.

And yet, CIT’s other business segments combined with other nonbank, unregulated, newsworthy companies that failed in 2008 and 2009 have shed new light on something referred to as “Shadow Banking,” which many believe is to blame for the recent economic crisis.  What began by general comments during a speech in 2008 has evolved into a full out mission.

Unfortunately, this new light may ultimately and indirectly impact the factoring and asset based lending (ABL) communities at large, which would also adversely affect small businesses.

How so? As early as February 2010, rumblings in the marketplace have noted that staffers may begin preparing new legislation in the regulatory reform bill, which is intended to regulate the Shadow Banking segment. Some believe, including the American Factoring Association, an advocacy arm of the IFA, that both factoring and ABL companies could be inadvertently bundled under the category of Shadow Banking.

Note, however, that the majority of these factoring/ABL companies are nonbank, unregulated financial institutions that provide ongoing working capital to small businesses. These are predominantly independent financial institutions. Their sole purpose is to provide capital to companies that simply do not qualify for traditional bank lending; they do not engage in the trading of derivatives or collateralized debt obligations. They do devote their energies towards accurately valuing the most liquid assets of a business such as receivables and inventory.  Funding is not provided based upon past financial performance, time in business, or even future earnings or performance of a business. This alternative form of finance is very different, while often misunderstood.

In the January 8, 2010 publication for The Deal, one article noted final legislation should be made public near “the end of 2010 for 2012 implementation. This means uncertainty will prevail for the bulk, if not all, of next year.” This article focused on mortgage securitization and other forms of finance, however, and not specifically Shadow Banking. With that said, many of the items addressed may also be included in the next legislative bill.

What are possible inclusions for this new bill? For one, possible tightened capital requirements for banks that finance factors and/or ABLs, thereby potentially limiting financing resources, or raising the cost of financing for factors and ABLs. In the article mentioned in The Deal, one possibility would be not just to tighten capital requirements but to assess standards for “fixed capital requirements for various types of risk-weighted assets.” Knowing that many of the companies using factoring and ABL services are not considered bankable, what would their risk weighting be considered?

Moreover, the ramifications of this heightened awareness and legislation has the potential to greatly impact small businesses by then shutting off working capital to these companies that is now so readily available through such forms of alternative finance. The result for many small business owners: fewer available financing options… and that is just the beginning…

There are some finance companies who believe this type of legislation may never occur, or that this regulation would have little impact on their business. There appear to be more who believe that this regulation needs to be addressed now, as the effects of such regulatory reform and legislation would dramatically impact their individual business, as well as the factoring/ABL industries and small businesses alike. As Adam Smith said, “…by pursuing [our] own interest [we] frequently promote[s] that of the society more effectually…”

The AFA has already identified a lobbying firm in Washington, D.C. to not only create a preemptive effort for the benefit of the factoring and ABL communities but to also increase awareness on how critical our segment of the commercial finance industry is for the U.S. economy as a whole. If you have questions on this potential legislation or to find out what you can do to help, contact the American Factoring Association at (805) 773.0021 or visit their website at www.AmericanFactoring.org.

Wishing us all continued success. The Factor Guru.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Purchase Order Financing a guest blog by Richard Eitelberg

Nov 21

Posted by admin in Sales and Marketing | No Comments

WHY PURCHASE ORDER FINANCING AND LETTERS OF CREDIT HAVE BECOME SAINTS AMIDST THE EVILS OF “THE GREAT RECESSION”

BY RICHARD EITELBERG, CPA, FOUNDER-PRESIDENT OF HARTSKO FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, A SEVEN-YEAR-OLD PURCHASE ORDER FINANCE FIRM WHICH HANDLES ABOUT $150M IN ANNUAL TRANSACTIONS, BASED IN BAYSIDE, NEW YORK (WWW.HARTSKO.COM)

e9dc31192f4c8656“The Great Recession” has left a lot of asset-based lenders and factors weak and lame.  Their inability during this period to access credit lines from banks, hedge funds, and equity investors often means they must restrict money to existing customers or refuse prospective clients.

Purchase Order Financing and Letters Of Credit generally looked upon as a last-resort bitter pill have seen increased acceptance as a way for a business owner to preserve a transaction opportunity.  With up front honesty, PF is expensive because of the very high risk issues involved and the intensive servicing requirements.  However, if a deal has the potential to yield a 30% profit or more—why should the business owner be concerned about sacrificing a few more percentage points over and above a traditional lender?  Is losing the opportunity to do the deal altogether, a better alternative?

Factors and asset-based lenders should realize that if they are at the end of their line with their client, referring the PF route can keep their relationship and income opportunity alive.  PF is a fast way for their client to secure funds needed to fulfill customer purchase orders and expand their business without giving up equity or trying to borrow additional funds (an option which no longer exists).

Here’s the process:

1.   The customer submits a purchase order to the client with all documents

2.   The client submits the customer purchase order to the PO financier for approval with all costs associated with transactions

3.   The PO financier will then will make direct payments to the client’s vendors so that the merchandise for the customer PO can be produced

4.   The client’s vendors deliver final product directly to the end customer or to a third party warehouse until shipped to end customer

5.   The seller then invoices the shipment and sends invoice and corresponding copy of customer PO to the factor

6.   The factor funds the invoice at his discount, paying the PO financier their loan plus fee

7.   The factor (or bank) collects from the end customer and pays the client their residual left from the advance

PF is taking a piece of equity in a client’s deal on a temporary basis, perhaps, thirty, sixty, ninety days, or 120 days.  A PF firm earns a fee on a precise part of the deal.  The PF firm doesn’t really “lend” a business money.  Most times, PF firms do not actually give a business any money or hard cash.  The PF firm’s money and equity backs up and supports the integrity of said purchase order.  It makes transactions work by opening up an LC usually overseas to procure merchandise, products, and materials for businesses.  (Or, wires are sent to domestic manufacturers to make purchases in behalf of businesses.)

PF is only transactional and temporary with the money going to fund the goods or merchandise in that specific transaction.  PF funds are not allocated to fund payroll, rents, cars, or any other business operations. Therefore, PF enables start-up companies to grow and troubled companies to survive.  Even bankrupt companies are generally able to access PF because the fees are guaranteed by the court.

Finally, in terms of the relationship, PF firms are not offended that a business owner may use this process one day, while returning to the factor or traditional lender the next day.  The PF community recognizes that PF is only going to be used when it is absolutely necessary and all other lender options have been exhausted.  The PF firm accepts that business owners and their lenders will only use it when they need it!

For more information on purchase order financing, feel free to visit www.Hartsko.com, or contact the IFA directly.

More about the author.

IMG_1009Richard Eitelberg is the Founder, President of Hartsko Financial Services, LLC., with offices in Bayside, New York and Deerfield, Illinois.  Mr. Eitelberg, was graduated from Michigan State University with a BA in Accounting.  He earned his license in certified public accounting (New York State).

Mr. Eitelberg has been the Chief Financial Officer for two garment industry companies: Adrian Landau Designs, and B. Lucid.  He was a Senior Auditor for Josephson, Luxemborg & Kantz, CPA’s, PC. He began Hartsko about seven years ago, assembling a group of private equity investors.  Today, Hartsko handles purchase order financing and letters of credit with some $150m in annual outstandings. (www.hartsko.com)

Mr. Eitelberg, a resident of Plainview, New York is a member of the Commercial Finance Association, the International Factoring Association (preferred vendor) and the Turnaround Management Association.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Factoring and Gambling: Part II

Jul 17

Posted by Gen Merritt in General Information | 1 Comment

820928dbf1b9db54 As a follow up to the Part I weblog from May, here are some other pokerisms (if that is even a word – probably not) that may be useful in your journey as  a factor… or they may just be entertaining. Either works.

* Don’t be a “fish,” otherwise defined as a bad poker player. These fish never truly understand how to play the game; they just keep playing. In  factoring, if you fund enough bad deals or make too many exceptions to the rules that result in losses, you will eventually lose… you may even lose your  business. Good factors know the rules of the game, develop them, and execute them every day. If you are not sure where to seek assistance on the rules,  attend an IFA seminar or call the IFA, an industry consultant or even a friendly competitor for help.

* Don’t throw good money after bad… sometimes, when you have a problem account, you may believe you need to continue providing working capital to the company so they stay in business. After all, if you are short on collateral, how else will you get your money back? This decision is not to be taken lightly. You cannot hope your way out of a deal that has gone bad, as they say.

Do your homework. What is really going on in the client’s business? How can it be corrected? Take your time to identify your exposure and other repayment or collateral options. Understand the inter-workings and financials of the business itself. Will putting more money into the pot really help get your money back?

* Learn from your mistakes… it happens. We can all become complacent in our monitoring protocols with long time clients. We make exceptions to get deals done quickly, or we believe we have covered all of our bases (i.e., seen all the options on the river) during our due diligence… only to find we missed something extremely important (or misread our cards).

However, we can only get better if we actually learn from those mistakes. Go through your history of losses. Make a list and refer back to it. What were the reasons those losses occurred? What were the exceptions, if any, you made to get the deal done? What were the common characteristics between the various transactions? What have you learned from looking at this list?

* What’s that song? “…Know when to fold ‘em. Know when to walk away. Know when to run…“

Did you see the July weblog “Understanding the Story… What If,” a guest blog by Darla Auchinachie? Once in awhile, there is a voice tapping you on the shoulder saying, “Um, perhaps it’s time to leave.” And, sometimes when you listen to this voice, you live to play another day.

* One bad call in judgment can destroy ten good calls. How many deals does it take to make up for a loss on one bad deal? Do the math…

* At some point, you will lose. You really can’t win them all. Some elements are out of your control. Structuring deals appropriately up front will however help mitigate losses significantly. Ask yourself on every transaction you review, “Can I get out tomorrow?” If not, why not? What can be done differently should you need to collect out of the deal?

* Being aggressive can be a good thing. When a deal goes awry, it is better to act and act quickly. In factoring, the entire client receivable base can turn over in 45 days. The longer you wait, the further you may be from your collateral. And, don’t forget that the longer an invoice stays open, the harder it is to collect.

Good luck. Wishing You Success in the Game. The Factor Guru.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Understanding the Story… “What If” a guest blog by Darla Auchinachie

Jul 9

Posted by Darla in Underwriting | 1 Comment

I recently became involved in underwriting an application for a factoring facility that brought me back to a session I co-instructed at the 2004 IFA Annual Factoring Conference. The title for that session: “Understanding the Paper you are Buying.” One of the ideas presented focused on how cutting corners in the due diligence process may lead to disastrous results. That was true five years ago, and it is even more so today.

It’s been said that it is very difficult to correct a bad underwriting decision, and anyone that has been tasked with a client “work-out” can echo that sentiment. The role of a factoring credit underwriter is to try to accurately predict that if a prospect is accepted for financing then that relationship will perform as expected – and to structure the facility in such a way that monitoring that performance can be effective. After the underwriter has recommended the prospect for financing, it becomes operation’s responsibility to employ the necessary procedures to protect and preserve the factor’s capital.

When you think about it, initial underwriting is a really tough job; even after you get past all the obstacles we understand academically, you still have to rely upon what your intuition tells you. And, after that, you have to determine if you are being too conservative or not conservative enough.

So, back to my original story about this application package, it was neat… too neat. Robust financials, plausible agings, strong guarantors, dare I say it – a factor’s dream. Of course there were issues a seasoned factor would spot such as the nature of the receivables having a “little hair on them” and the customers, while nicely spread out and quasi-governmental, still thin on the credit side. Of particular interest was the volume – it was substantial for the small non-traditional market. Who wouldn’t love funding a new prospect with a receivable base of several million, especially if it could be done for a desirable rate?

Personally, I wasn’t comfortable with the deal. It wasn’t necessarily the receivables themselves; it was more about the “Conditions” of the deal – Conditions is one of those “C’s” of credit we should never forget when underwriting. You see, the company had experienced tremendous growth in the past fiscal year, and by tremendous growth, I mean well over a 150% increase in revenues. But wait…

In this economy today, what industry could possibly support that kind of growth? I’m not talking about a startup company whose revenues might be expected to grow at a steep pace. This was a company that had been around for decades and had never experienced such a sharp increase in sales.

Another interesting Condition was that the prospect already had a factor funding their receivables. Usually this is not a cause for concern. In fact, it’s quite common to see an applicant who is already factoring. As part of the initial qualifying stage, the business development officer contacted the current factor and was given a glowing recommendation: the factor loved their client, had experienced zero dilution over the course of a multi-year relationship and wished they could keep funding the client. It was the client’s growth that had outstripped the factor’s ability to fund.

However, here is where the story becomes a little more interesting… 442f0b535d06bd4e2

The prospect urged the incoming factor to “rush” funding. They needed the capital to continue operating during this explosive growth cycle. One should ask, “Why?”

Well, common sense and experience were telling me something was not quite right: the recent growth, the current factor volunteering there had never been any dilution over the course of a long funding relationship, and now the company needed to rush the initial funding for a payoff. Why was a participation arrangement not being considered or requested?

I know many factoring companies and believe that most have very capable and honest folks, but this factor in particular was relatively new to the industry and now had a several million dollar deal that had outgrown them. I’d never met this factor at any industry event; I even called other factors to see if they had any experience or knowledge of this financial source – no one did. Because of this, I recommended that my client (remember the one who originally engaged me to review the application) fully and strongly verify the receivable base before getting too far down the road. My client asked me, “Why shouldn’t we rely upon the existing factor’s story and records?”. And, this is what brought me back to that class in 2004…

It was after that session when a factor approached me stating they wished they would have attended this course before taking on a rather large client. They had relied upon another factor’s story, similar to the one described above. To their detriment, they funded the prospect’s receivables. You see, the incoming factor didn’t have a large enough staff to fully verify the invoices, and the payoff was also a “rush” situation. As it turned out, there was not enough true collateral. The incoming factor had wanted to appease the client and get the deal done. They had “assumed” the information received from the prior factor was accurate. Therefore, the incoming factor only made a few random calls instead of following their normal procedure of verifying a large percentage of the collateral.

I know several factors who would say they would never do such a thing: fund a large client without full verification – but what about those newer factoring companies? We’ve seen the number of factors steadily increasing over the years, and yet many of these businesses may not survive. I think this story provides a good reason why newer factoring companies tend to fail. They do not understand (or believe) that fraud exists, that there are people waiting for opportunities to intentionally defraud factors or lenders out of their capital. Further, they believe they can correct their cutting corners on the initial funding by performing post funding verifications. Really? I think if this is the plan, you will just know sooner that you have a fraud. Once the money is sent… it may really be gone.

Yes, it is important to talk to the prior factor and hear their story. However, you should not solely rely on what they say… especially where your interests are not the same. Perform your own due diligence.

Newer factors might not have experienced a fraud; they may assume the current factor has strong procedures in place that mirror their own. But, what if the current factor hasn’t figured out what they have on the books isn’t any good? Or, what if the current factor knows but is hoping someone takes them out of the deal? And then, what if the incoming factor just doesn’t have sufficient resources or time to verify the accounts? Well, that sounds like just too many “What if’s?”

Be aware of what your intuition tells you. Or as my friends in Texas say, “Go with your gut feel.” Business is tough for everyone, and we all want to fund new deals. But, just because you catch a nice fish on your line doesn’t mean you should take it home and fry it up – sometimes catch and release may be better off for the longevity of your factoring company.

Oh, and just in case you were wondering about that deal I was engaged to review… the factor did start calling to verify invoices before they funded even with the glowing recommendation from the prior factor. The result: Declined. While I won’t go into great detail, remember that a factor’s best friend can be the Internet and that searches and reverse phone number searches on customers can be easily checked.

Until the next time…

Tags: , , , , , ,

It’s All Bananas a guest blog by Darla Auchinachie

Jan 20

Posted by Darla in General Information | Comments off

You’re not supposed to get ‘weepy eyed’ over golf… or, at least I’m not. I finally watched The Greatest Game Ever Played. Do you know what I thought (after crying… which I don’t do so erase it from your memory)? Passion, persistence, and dedication. Those are the words I would use to describe how I feel about factoring, our industry, what we do (as factors) to help others: industry peers and clients alike. You have to believe in what you are doing. Period.

It also brought about something else: help others, acknowledge those that are learning and work to help them succeed. Several people, industry veterans as I would call them, always went above and beyond, out of their way, and more to help me learn more. I was lucky, I guess.

For this weblog posting, a friend of mine and one of my mentors, Darla Auchinachie, a 17-year veteran in the factoring industry and a long time speaker, board member and advisor for the IFA, agreed to write an article. To maintain this trend of helping others in the industry and showing her continued dedication to the industry, she has shared an article with us that rings true… for factors, clients and others. Pay attention. I always did.

This is an open letter to every factoring company executive. 

                Unless you’ve been stranded on an island the past year, you probably haven’t been able to escape the news concerning the biggest economic crisis to hit since most of us embarked in the career of factoring.  As we enter the new year the media claims we just can’t wait to get this behind us.  But wait, the factoring community simply can’t go along as business as usual expecting to avoid being impacted by the crisis merely because a new year is upon us. 

                It’s time to take a serious look in house and be prepared to engage in some strategic planning to take your company through these incredibly challenging times.  I spoke to a trusted friend recently, his comments keep ringing through my ears.  He says, “Its bananas out here”.  Yep, that sums the economic crisis up, especially to the all the factoring companies, bananas just bananas. 

                The economy is shrinking, but wait it’s the perfect storm for us – banks will get out of our space, we’ll be flooded with opportunities is one point of view.  Another says yeah, but credit is our biggest concern right now, and it should be retailers, the auto industry, the oil companies in our account debtor base, the bankruptcies are sure to start stacking up come the first few months of the year.  Yet others are concerned for their own liquidity and access to capital. 

                Bananas, heck we have a whole fruit salad. 

                I call on every factoring company to consider taking action on a few items which will see them through the murky times ahead.  Look, no one knows what’s going to happen; we truly are in un-chartered territory, most fear to make predictions, some believe that we will be on our way to recovery by the end of 2009, and yet others are planning how to best benefit through it all. 

                How can you benefit when you can’t even be sure which way the economy will turn or how long this recession will last?  Well, you can’t control the future but you can be informed and prepared, lest you are blindsided by any number of salvos which will surely come your way. 

                They are saying that we are entering into a period of economic Darwinism.  That is to say, only the strong are going to survive.  For example, Wal-Mart will no doubt end up stronger because of the smaller retailers who will fail due to the downturn of the economy.  Here are five steps a factoring company can undertake to make sure they live to factor another day.

#1

                Re-underwrite every client in your portfolio.

                Yes, now is the time to know what you have, the good, the bad and the ugly.  Trust me; every portfolio has some ugly in it.  There is no better time than now.  Sure, most factoring company’s resources are already stretched beyond the limits due to the influx of new business, but if you don’t stop to take a look at what you already have, you will be in for some trouble.

                While the economy had been growing by leaps and bounds and credit had been so readily available, every factor benefited; we took on clients whose risk profile was higher than we would like to admit.  We cannot bury our head in the sand anymore.  You have to know what portion of your portfolio is performing and which portion will become plagued by the recession.

                If you do not have current financial information on your clients, now is the time to request it.  If you don’t have a recent UCC search, why not run a new one?  When was the last time you engaged in a background check on existing clients?  It’s time to look beyond historical dilution and trends, instead it’s time to take a reading on the client’s overall financial health as that is the indicator which will foretell their ability to survive. 

#2

                Re-structure Relationships

                When you find those clients most negatively impacted or the clients whose financial risk profile has changed, you must seriously consider altering the structure of that relationship.  For example, you may have taken a secured position on a piece of commercial real estate as secondary collateral to support a factoring relationship whose risk profile was not in line with your traditional limits.  What is the value of that real estate now?  What is the financial health of the client now? 

                If revenues are down, how is that affecting the business?  What can you really do when you are already in a relationship?  Make sure you are utilizing every collateral monitoring and availability tool in the book.  Don’t let invoices age; don’t take on unnecessary credit risk.  Counsel your clients on being very careful about extending credit terms to marginal customers.  Start building additional reserves if necessary.

                Reduce your exposure whenever possible.  Make sure your client’s maintain some skin in the game.  Consumers are walking away from the value in their homes because they just can’t make ends meet.  What decisions will your client have to make with their business?  How does that impact your existing A/R?

#3

                Get your house in order and have a contingency plan.

                Since we don’t know what surprises are on the horizon for the next 12 months, it might also be a good idea to keep your books and records in manageable order.  Whether you have $500,000 of your own funds employed or you work for a company who has $200 million employed, there is a very real possibility in 2009 that a factoring company’s access to additional capital will be slim to none.

                Be prepared for an audit either from your capital provider(s) or from which you are seeking capital.  The better your files are, the better your audit results will be.  It doesn’t hurt to triple check that your documentation is in order, proper names, trade names, and all that.  By the way, when was the last time you checked to see if a client was still operating under good standing status in their state, update everything in your files!

                Factoring companies may find it hard to raise capital in the form of subordinated debt; others may find that their institutional funding has dried up.  Worse still, your lender could exit the business abruptly.  Have you taken the time to review your portfolio and operations to make sure it remains attractive to capital providers?

                Seek out assistance within the industry or outside of the industry, but do something and have a plan in place should something like this occur.  If you make it past 2009 and the economy heads upwards you may breath a sigh of relief – until then, how prepared are you?

#4

                Keep employees educated and motivated.

                Factoring is such a unique business, there is a human element deeply engrained in this profession.  Make sure the folks on the ground know how to sniff out problems.  Account Executives shouldn’t let a week go by without having some contact with the principals of your clients.

                Stay involved in providing continuing education to every member of your team.  Let them know that the playing field has changed out there.  It’s not all about proper verification and notification anymore.  Your team should be looking out for different kinds of stresses such as signs of employee theft as well as pre-billing, over billing, and the like. 

#5

                Don’t be afraid to take action. 

                Sometimes, as a factor we are faced with making unpopular choices, especially when it comes to calling a client in default and entering into a realization phase.  Now is not the time to use hope as means to operate, it is the time to deal with facts.  Clients who do not have the ability to cash flow even with the factor’s funding may simply be too big a risk to continue servicing. 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Complacency: Don’t Assume

Nov 16

Posted by Gen Merritt in Operations | No Comments

The other day, someone sent me samples of backup documentation to review for a new prospect. The client (a transportation carrier) had been with another factor prior and was still being financed by that factor. The good news, however, was that the potential new factoring company wanted to make sure they understood the ‘paper’ they were buying… before they actually bought it. They had questions. They didn’t want to assume. So, they asked.

As it would turn out, the paperwork for the invoices (i.e., invoice, rate confirmation and the bill of lading) indicated other carriers that had hauled the load, or they revealed loads were picked up… but not yet delivered. Strange I thought. However, during the initial verifications on the invoices, the calls with customers of the carrier (or account debtors) evidenced that the loads were real; however, the goods were still en route. What do you know? Would this be an incident of pre-billing?

More than likely… yes. Here’s the question though. What does this mean to the current factor? The only thing I could come up with that happens all the time: complacency. You know what I mean. That thing that happens over time when you become comfortable with a client relationship, you stop looking at all their paperwork, you don’t call as often on their invoices as you used to, etc. Complacency does happen.

Now is the time to look at those clients’ performance, and more importantly, to review the account management on those accounts — to review the processes and procedures in your portfolio. Typically, factors feel they know the ‘weaknesses’ in their portfolio already. They ‘watch’ those accounts ongoing. Yet, it is the client you know and love that sometimes has issues… causing financial challenges… and potential exposure and risk to the factor.

The current economic climate dictates vigilance. It requires relentless review of your portfolio. It doesn’t stop there: looking more at the invoices and backup documentation being reviewed, how the collection calls are going and how checks are coming into the lockbox can be critical. In this new financial environment, a good check and balance system should be in place, even an internal audit each quarter or a few times each year. Otherwise, how will you feel comfortable that your processes and procedures in place are being adhered to sufficiently?

How will you know complacency is not occurring? Several firms perform these services including Factor Source, Factor Help, and several other examination and auditing firms. Or, call the International Factoring Association for consultation and assistance. You can even have someone internally review these processes. This is not a sales opportunity but a mantra for looking at your portfolio… over and over and over again. I believe it was Keith Reid who said, “If you think fraud isn’t in your portfolio, then you just haven’t looked hard enough.”

Yes, these internal exercises may appear to be in vain and actually may result in nothing being found. (What a relief). And, yet, if you identify a potential concern before it transcends into a true problem… then, it is worth it, right?

Vigilance is the test for a factor. Yes, trust, by verify; however, maintain vigilance. Reduce complacency. Focus on not just sending money out the door but also getting the money back.

Wishing you success. The Factor Guru.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,