The Factor Guru

Tips on accounts receivable financing and business practices.

Posts Tagged invoice financing

DON’T REJECT CONSTRUCTION FACTORING OPPORTUNITIES… a guest blog by Earl Harper

Oct 21

Posted by Gen Merritt in Sales and Marketing | Comments off

The unprecedented level of public works construction projects planned and currently underway throughout the U.S. means abundant opportunities for contractors and subs, many of whom are transitioning from purely commercial projects to the public sector for the first time and most of whom are undercapitalized. For most factors and asset-based lenders, factoring construction receivables is an anathema that they do not touch but this market provides promise that they should not pass up and there are several factors which have had a demonstrated success in transacting these deals.  So factors should think twice before they discard these income prospects or, at least, referrals should be made to factors specializing in construction deals to promote business relationships.  In all likelihood there are referral fees, participation opportunities and/or commissions to be made by the referring factor or broker.  And the recipient factor, in all likelihood, will return the favor with future business.

Most factors avoid construction because of the high risk in handling these invoices.  To make significant money the factor really has to be properly set up to address this niche.  In the case of our portfolio, we add one primary eligibility safety net by only entertaining public works construction projects.

How does a factor who does not specialize in this niche know that a colleague has the capacity for public works construction?  Question them about the following capabilities:

—Does this factor engage in “progress billing”?  Can they handle invoices covering a percentage of the completed project which are part of a larger contract (different from spot factoring where each individual invoice closes out)?

—Will this factor take on “bonded contracts”? Will they factor receivables even though it is implied that the surety is in first position?

—Does this factor have a “disbursement program” with funds control, so that advances are only used to pay costs on that specific job?  Through this program the factor provides a high level of assurance to project owners, General Contractors, etc. that funds advanced go only to that job before any other contractor expenses get paid.

—Can this factor undertake initial plan reviews, evaluating the project and the bid of the contractor to make sure that the contractor has the ability to perform the work estimated with their available labor using the specified materials required in accordance with the pricing quoted, in the time frame provided?

The 6-C’s of credit (Character, Capacity, Capital, Collateral, Conditions, and Controls) are the key for factors to analyze contractors and subs seeking working capital and cash flow.  It is critical for both the contractor and the factor to fully understand their transaction.

To pre-qualify a prospective contractor or sub, company ownership, structure, existing lending relationships, current accounts payable and accounts receivable aging summary are evaluated. Also reviewed is the current and previous year’s financial statement including balance sheet and income statement. We look for a candidate who does not have liens and judgments that can get between the factor and the receivable.  We look for a record of past profitability and whether margins exist to be able to afford our form of capitalization.  At this point of the discussion, a demonstration to the contractor of how our capitalization increases their ability to be profitable and benefit from procurement discounts is important in selling a deal of this nature.

Additionally, the prospect should have at least one or two years of experience in the type of construction they are working on and have a personal credit score of 550-600 or higher. A lower credit score does not always prohibit the factor from proceeding, though. The factor must determine why the contractor suffers from weak credit and determine if there are actions that can be taken through the factoring of their receivables that can result in the contractor becoming credit-worthy without increasing the risk to the factor.

Because most banks continue to be unwilling to lend working capital to contractors, the current need in this space is extraordinary.  Factors should not dismiss these opportunities for income-producing deals in the building trades and general construction which are ready-to-go.

About the author. Earl Harper is a Senior Vice President with RMP Capital Corporation, a national factor specializing in public works construction based in Islandia, New York.  Mr. Harper has more than 15-years of experience with the management of contractor financing and employee benefit program administration.  Mr. Harper’s specialty at RMP Capital is servicing the needs and businesses of their client contractors, from bringing in new contractors, to giving extensive coverage and care to their existing clients. Prior to his success in the financial world, Mr. Harper spent over 24-years as a military officer retiring from the Army as a Colonel.  Mr. Harper is also a graduate of the US Army War College and has a bachelor’s degree from Iowa Wesleyan College. To find out more about Earl Harper or RMP Capital, visit their website at www.RMPCapital.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Banks and Equity Funds Starting to Look Again for Accelerated Returns, a guest blog by Neville Grusd, C.P.A.

Mar 18

Posted by Danny Frank in General Information | 1 Comment

It is widely acknowledged that the past eighteen months have been one of the most challenging “survival of the fittest” periods in modern history, for factors.  Yes, our economy and specifically the commercial finance sector are now budding a few small signs of stability with dashes of optimism.  (We are a long way from seeing the frenzy of liberal capital and loose credit which characterized our industry less than five years ago.)

The hibernation of hedge funds, private equity interests and investors is ending as they become hungry for stronger returns.  However, coming from a strategy where this community pretty much shut down their money flow altogether—they now want very high returns in exchange for cash and credit lines.

Meanwhile, commercial banks have turned off their lending spigots for small business because of the volatile credit conditions, and the aggressive enforcement oversight by government regulators who prohibit these lenders from any perceived questionable transactions.

At this time, the credit line needs of factors should be one of the best income-earning risks which banks can entertain.  Unfortunately, many bankers have a mind-set:  They do not lend to finance companies.

When their questions and concerns about this issue are examined, their reasons are often distorted and lacking in fact.  Many commercial bankers ask:  “Why should our bank give a credit line to a finance company, when we would not make the small business loans being made by the finance company, ourselves?”  They argue that the loans often made by the finance company are to “unbankable” business entities.  These companies are not strong enough, not old enough, with a problematic track record and worse.

We are not lending solely on historical balance sheets.  We are lending mainly based upon collateral which we manage on a daily basis (while most banks only look at financial statements on an annual basis). We also look at a company’s future business based on their orders in the pipeline.

Commercial banks and factors need to find common ground to reach prosperity together.  When driving a car, do you spend most of your attention looking in the rear view mirror, looking at where you have been?  Or, do you stay focused on the windshield and watch where you are going as you move forward?

If those “unbankable” small businesses have valued collateral, which we as factors and asset-based lenders can control—we are able to provide them money to help these businesses grow.

The lending marketplace has room for both the commercial bank along with factors and asset-based lenders.  If a business owner has a strong balance sheet, they are going to seek out a bank because it is cheaper and less work to submit occasional financial statements.  If a business owner is undercapitalized yet their company offers a lot of potential, and they want to take advantage of every opportunity which comes along—asset-based lending and factoring is very appropriate.

So long as banks conduct their usual due diligence, they will find that extending credit lines to finance companies is a good quality risk, many times better than their regular lending standards.  Most times these loans are diversified, spread out, over different industries, different geographic areas, different customers, different payment schedules, so the finance company is not dependent on any one particular loan, the risk is much less than they would find in one regular business.

Furthermore, the people running these finance companies are often very experienced, very professional in the depth and knowledge of the industries they are financing.  They are executives the banks can “talk to” as opposed to many businesses where an owner’s lack of understanding breeds a strained, perhaps, negative relationship.

Another silver lining, for banks giving credit lines to factors and asset-based lenders, is the potential of a finance company to provide mutual referrals.  As a business becomes more stable where it progresses into a more attractive prospect for a traditional bank, now the factor or asset-based lender is in an advantageous position to hand off their client to a bank of its choice.  There will be strong influence in that decision by the finance company which has helped the business owner.

There are only a small handful of banks which have recognized the vista of lending to finance companies. They have benefited from these relationships for many years.

About the Author:

BY NEVILLE GRUSD, C.P.A., EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, MERCHANT FACTORS CORPORATION (WWW.MERCHANTFACTORS.COM) WITH OFFICES IN NEW YORK CITY AND LOS ANGELES.  MR. GRUSD IS A DIRECTOR AND ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE COMMERCIAL FINANCE ASSOCIATION (CFA).  HE IS A MEMBER OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD FOR THE C.P.A. JOURNAL, THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.

Tags: , , , ,

No Horror Stories Here… a guest blog by Darla Auchinachie

Sep 12

Posted by Darla in Sales and Marketing | Comments off

halloweenAs the aisles in the retail stores remind me, Halloween is just around the corner.  I just received an invite to a friend’s annual costume party in Phoenix – this year the theme is Mel Brook’s movies; it will be fun to decide what to wear to that!  To be honest, Halloween isn’t my favorite hallmark holiday – you see my birthday is in October – and throughout my childhood my mother thought it was “cute” to have a witch, ghost, goblin themed or (insert wacky Halloween reference here) themed birthday party for me.  What if I didn’t care for spiders or skeletons?  Well, it just didn’t matter – moms will be moms… enough said. Even though October is generally the “scariest” month of the year with haunted houses and jack-o-lanterns dotting the landscape, I’m in the mood to shine a good light on factoring…

This has been an amazing year so far for factors. I say amazing, but I could probably come up with dozens of adjectives and each would be fitting.  Words like challenging, tough, and busy come to mind too.  This year is different though; I have observed something markedly different than in all my history in this business, which is the huge amount of exposure our industry has enjoyed.  Never before has the word “factoring” appeared so many times in news searches on the internet.  Sometimes the stories are good, you know the ones where factoring is seen as a positive form of finance – other times the stories aren’t so great, like fraud occurring either within a factor’s portfolio or those rogue entities that raise money ostensibly for the purpose of purchasing receivables to only use the funds for anything but factoring.  CIT’s troubles alone have brought factoring into the limelight.  While I truly wish the best for that company and who knows how that will all end up, I suppose I am grateful that more and more of the population has heard of factoring just from reading about CIT in the news.

I have the pleasure of working with multiple factoring companies on a variety of projects – and in so doing have gained a very unique perspective on the state of the industry today – guess what, there are many new deals being booked daily all over the place!  Those factors who have strong underwriting and portfolio management standards as well as their own capital and access to liquidity are finally able to grow their client base simply because other forms of finance are not available.  On the other hand, there are factoring companies who struggle with access to liquidity and declining sales volumes because their client’s sales have decreased.  There are also start up factoring companies opening all over the country as they see factoring as a good business to be in – as long as those folks are seeking out education and assistance and respect established standards, they should be able to do well.  Unless every single factor I’ve been talking to is fibbing, they’ve all been busy putting on new deals – and don’t see their pipeline dwindling any time soon.  Nope, no horror stories here.

A factoring company (just like any other business) wants to make a profit at the end of the day.  This is no easy task when you consider the amount of overhead it takes to run a factoring operation.  Salaries, Credit Expense, Cost of Funds, Rent, Due Diligence Expense, Lock-Box Fees are just a few of the expenditures a factor has.  The smart ones also put a little away each month to build up a loss reserve should the inevitable occur.  To the average person on the street, when they see what a factoring arrangement is priced at, may feel it is exorbitantly high, but when you take away the actual costs to provide this service, you’d be surprised at how little of those fees actually make it to the bottom line.

All that being said – factors have to charge what they charge because factoring is labor intensive and expensive to operate.  If the factor just purchased invoices and advanced funds, they would be out of business very quickly – that translates into fewer companies providing this critical form of finance – not a good thing for the general business environment.   That would be a horror story.

I think that many factoring companies (at least those that I deal with and talk to routinely) are in this business both to make a little profit and because it’s rewarding to help companies survive by providing working capital.  No one I know is in the business of gouging their client base. Moreover, it takes effort to find a client, to perform due diligence confirming the factor can make a difference for that company and then to bring the client on board to provide financing.  We all strive at that point to keep the client active for as long as possible – the average being 18-24 months.  I recently spoke to the head of a factoring company that said they’ve been able to keep their average client to up to 30 months!

Factors actually work hard at the collection process to help keep receivables turning so that the costs of factoring remains as low as possible for their clients.  These aren’t heavy handed collection tactics, merely good old fashioned solid receivables management techniques.  The result is that the client also maintains a healthy bottom line.  Client’s who grow or mature enough to be able to qualify for bank financing make this all a win-win situation.

When I hear of “client horror stories,” I am disheartened by the hyperbole.  I guess I come from the side of the fence that a client horror story is one wherein the client  figured out the perfect fraud and then absconded with big piles o’ cash.    While there is press that suggests that factoring companies are Good, Bad or Evil – these are all emotional terms – working capital shouldn’t be emotional.

If a business needs a factor they can look to any number of resources to find the best arrangement possible.  Price and Structure should not be the only deciding factors (pun intended).  One company may offer a low rate but then require monthly minimums and a term of one year, while the next company may offer a higher rate with an easy out and no minimums.  Some companies even offer programs that adjust with the client’s sales volume.  If you spend the time to understand the differences, you’ll probably find that in the end most offers are relatively equal in costs (plus or minus some basis points).  So if all terms are equal, what can a business seeking a funding source do?

The answer: get to know the factoring company. Ask for client references, and then… actually call them.  Does the factor have a history of taking care of their clients?  How long does the average client stay with the factor?  Is it only three months?  Or is it two years?  What other services does the factor provide? Same day funding on schedules received by noon or does funding take 48 hours or more (routine funding not the initial funding)?  Does the factor understand your business?  How well do you relate/communicate with representatives of the factoring company?  Is the company secure – do you think they will be there when you need them?  Are they in the same time zone as you, and if not does it make a difference (to some it might – to others it won’t).  Are you working directly with a funding source or through a broker?  How do you know the broker is really looking at the best deal for you?  There are so many other issues besides price alone!  If sales volumes can be maintained, maybe the smaller fee with minimums is the way to go. If not, then the higher priced deal may look more attractive.

If I go back to how I started this article, I was shopping… so, look at it this way, when you buy a plain white shirt from a low cost retailer, you probably don’t expect for the shirt to last very long – seams unravel, it gets stretched out, etc…  Buying a similar shirt from a more expensive retailer probably means the shirt will cost more, but the stitching will be different and the fabric might be stronger, and generally speaking, that shirt ought to be in your wardrobe for much longer than the less expensive one.  Which do you buy?  That’s a personal decision. For me, I’d spend extra just to know I would have something of quality… something that would last.

One more thing, you know that factor that quotes a lower rate but then imposes minimum volumes – well, I’ll be willing to bet that can be negotiated.  The negotiation however probably won’t be that the factor will maintain the same low rate without minimums – they simply can’t afford to do business this way.  In order for any transaction to work, it has to benefit all parties – everyone needs to “win.”

It’s a shame when clients don’t fully understand what they’ve signed up for though.  I was taught early on to never sign something that I either didn’t understand or didn’t agree with.  I make it a matter of practice to fully read any document I need to execute and if something isn’t clear to me, then it’s my duty to learn more before signing, and that’s just personally.  Shouldn’t a business owner follow the same rule?  Imagine signing a three year lease and then three months into the lease deciding that you no longer wish to rent the space.  There will be penalties from the landlord to break that lease, why should factoring be any different?

So, I don’t have any horror stories, even though Halloween is near.  Factoring works because those providing the capital know what needs to be done in order to protect that capital, and clients understand that having access to that capital comes with a price. Clients need to look at their business critically to determine if factoring works for them or not.  The business that has very low margins probably shouldn’t factor; the businesses that have some room to absorb the costs of factoring almost always benefit by having the working capital to sustain and grow their operations.  Most factoring companies probably have tons of success stories, and even those that do will have experienced a relationship that did not end well.

I think it’s up to us as an industry to maintain how positive factoring arrangements can be for everyone – not just the factor and not just the client.  This is the business we’ve all chosen to be in and I’m proud to be a member of this community.  I don’t want to dwell on situations that I’m not directly involved in, and I try not to lay blame when the facts aren’t public.  I’d rather shout out that factors are here to serve the businesses that need our funding, and we’ve got the capital to be able to help.

Let’s all take advantage of these current economic times by continually promoting that factoring is a great form of finance!  Lift up our industry for the greater good.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

FAQs: Transportation Qualification

Jul 7

Posted by Gen Merritt in Sales and Marketing | No Comments

I noticed when I returned from vacation there were several questions on transportation factoring. One of them stuck with me: What are some questions I should ask a small trucking company to help qualify them for factoring? Below are some questions you may want to consider:

* Tell me about your business. How long has the business been around? What did you do before starting this business? Hints: This conversation may also help establish the type of monitoring that would be involved with the account.

* How many trucks are you running? Depending on the type of loads being hauled, trucks may typically carry from $8,000 to $12,000 a month in loads; loads hauled generally do not exceed $15,000 a month per truck unless the company operates in a unique niche of the marketplace, provides heavy hauling, etc.

* Are you hauling full loads or LTL (less than a truckload)? Hints: LTL means smaller invoices and more paperwork; risk is spread among many invoices and customers which helps diversify the risk profile while also creating additional work in the account management.

* Where do you get your loads? Do you have steady customers or do you get loads from load boards? Hint: if all loads come off the web, the client may struggle maintaining business profitably as these loads tend to be lower paying.

* Who are your major customers (i.e., shippers, brokers, names of companies, etc.)? How many customers do you have? How many of them are repeat customers? How do your customers typically pay? Hints: if the customers pay very slowly, then your fees will be higher; the client may not be able to afford factoring. Trucking industry receivables tend to pay in less than 45 days. These questions will also give you an idea of how much time an account will take for notification, verification and collection purposes.

* What is your typical invoice size? Hints: there is no “typical” but get a range from low to high. However, unless a trucking company is doing heavy hauling loads, they should not have large dollar invoices (i.e., $5,000).

* What is your current billing process? How does it work? Can you walk me through what you typically do to get your customers their invoices and how long that process takes?

* Do you have any special arrangements with any customers on advances for fuel, quick payment terms, or anything else?

* Do you have a line of credit at the bank now? Hint: if yes, then a bank take out may be in order or subordination on the receivables.

* Do you have employees? Hint: if yes, the client should be current with payroll taxes and other obligations. The client may use owner operators as well. If so, how many; are they always the same drivers or different ones each time, etc.? This may also reveal whether the company is brokering loads to other carriers.

* Is the company profitable now? Hint: if they have a reasonable profit margin, the client should easily be able to afford factoring.

* What about 2290 (heavy vehicle highway use) taxes? Do you have these? Are they paid currently? Hint: remember that these taxes are due annually and have the same priority on factors and lenders as payroll taxes.

The list of questions can go on and will expand based upon the company’s answers. Understanding their business, the collectibility of the invoices, and your risk-reward profile will help you better structure a transaction. Feel free to add more by commenting to this post.

Wishing You Continued Success. The Factor Guru.

Tags: , , , ,

What is Factoring?

Sep 25

Posted by Gen Merritt in General Information | No Comments

Factoring, accounts receivable financing, invoice financing, discounting – or whatever you want to call it – is a commonly used form of finance that provides immediate working capital to businesses. A factoring company purchases the accounts receivable, or invoices, from a company (the client). This purchase of accounts receivable typically requires the client to have sales to commercial customers (account debtors) who are credit worthy, with terms of sale usually around 30 days and less than 60 days.

Generally, these sales are for completed orders (for goods delivered or services rendered). This includes a variety of industries including, but not limited to, manufacturing, staffing, transportation and logistics, distributing, importing/exporting, medical and healthcare businesses, oil and gas, consulting, IT and technology, services, construction and many others. Some factoring companies will finance progressive or milestone billings, although this tends to be the exception more than the normal course of operation.

Once the invoices have been sold to the factor, the client receives an ‘advance’ of anywhere from 50% to 95% of the invoice, with an average advance rate more likely at 80% to 85%. Advance rates depend on the industry in which the client operates, billing practices of the client, and payment patterns of the account debtors. For example, a client in the construction industry may have offsets for subcontractor payments, retainage, and other industry related offsets. In this case, a lower advance rate may be warranted. On the other hand, staffing and transportation businesses tend to have fewer reasons for non-payment of an invoice, resulting in a higher advance rate being offered.

Assuming an 80% advance rate, the factor would then retain a 20% ‘reserve,’ which would be released back to the client once the account debtor has made payment to the factor (less the factoring or discount fees that have been earned and/or accrued).  Before these payments are made to the factor, this reserve is often called an ‘accrued’ or ‘escrowed’ reserve. Once the payment has been received, however, this reserve becomes a ‘cash’ reserve, assuming full payment of the invoice (or at least the funds advanced plus fees) has been received. Factors may hold cash reserves for other potential invoices that are aging out on the factor’s books, have known disputes, or where other credit criteria may deem holding such cash reserves necessary.

Factoring can be a useful tool to companies seeking capital or needing to increase their working capital cycle. Stay tuned for more details on the inter-workings of factoring and its importance to helping companies manage their cash and their receivables while focusing on the growth of their business.  

For reference, you may want to read Wikipedia, which has a good general overview of factoring including a brief history. About.com also had some other reference information on the benefits of factoring.

Happy reading. The Factor Guru.

Tags: , , , , , ,