<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Factor Guru &#187; swiss cheese theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.factorguru.com/tag/swiss-cheese-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.factorguru.com</link>
	<description>Tips on accounts receivable financing and business practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Swiss Cheese Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.factorguru.com/2008/11/the-swiss-cheese-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.factorguru.com/2008/11/the-swiss-cheese-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gen Merritt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Underwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounts receivable finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factor guru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[six Cs of credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swiss cheese theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is factoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factorguru.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do some deals make it and others don’t, even when they have similar characteristics? Even when you go through the company background, the receivable base and performance, financial trends and sometimes the background and credit of the guarantor, in some cases, a prospect may not fit into your box. Why? Well, this can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.factorguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/swiss-cheese2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-108" title="swiss-cheese2" src="http://www.factorguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/swiss-cheese2.jpg" alt="" width="125" height="125" /></a>Why do some deals make it and others don’t, even when they have similar characteristics? Even when you go through the company background, the receivable base and performance, financial trends and sometimes the background and credit of the guarantor, in some cases, a prospect may not fit into your box. Why? </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">Well, this can be attributed to just a deal that doesn’t fit within a factoring company’s target client profile. It may, however, be perfect for another factoring company based upon their niche, risk profile, or other criteria. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">One other reason may be because too many holes exist. What does this mean? </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">Someone (I believe it was <span style="font-size: 11pt; color: #000000; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><a href="http://www.corebc.com/OurTeam.htm"><span style="color: #800080;">Michael Haddad, Core Business Credit</span></a>)</span> told me once that when you mitigate too many risks in a transaction… it’s like a block of Swiss cheese. There are too many holes without enough cheese holding it all together. I know… sounds weird but the analogy stuck.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">Since factoring is more of an art, I think this Swiss cheese theory helps explain why.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">So, what are the holes? Many look at the six Cs of credit when reviewing a prospective client transaction. I tend to break it down to four key areas instead (as I can never remember the other two as everyone seems to have a different other two): Character, Collateral, and Credit, along with Common Sense of course. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">You may ask why Character first? The person running the business who has the relationship with the customers can be critical when reviewing a new transaction. How they manage their personal finances may be indicative of how they manage their business and, ultimately, how they may work with their factor or lender during challenging financial times. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">Collateral remains the foundation of factoring. Some important questions to think about: Who does the company sell to (what types of customers)? How is the customer credit? What type of industry does the company operate in and what current trends are ongoing in that industry that may affect the collateral? Do concentrations exist? What does the aging reflect about aged invoices or credits? How does the company bill? When is an invoice considered accepted by the company’s customers? </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">The third element, Credit, can include customer credit; however, what about the credit of the company? What do their financial statements show? What is going on in the business? What is their margin and does it support the factoring expense? Are there any entries or trends that require additional explanation? Remember, reviewing one period of time only provides a snapshot; however, having prior financial statements to compare against may help show trends in the business. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">Finally, Common Sense is a must. This is the key element that brings all the other pieces together. Does the information reviewed correspond to the discussions held to date? Are there any areas that remain unclear or are conflicting with the information reviewed?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Have the holes been mitigated in a way that would result in a successful collection, should the need arise? Is there enough cheese… or, are there too many holes?</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #000000; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size: small;">Wishing you success. The Factor Guru</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.factorguru.com/2008/11/the-swiss-cheese-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

